Table 2 The performance of RUBic was evaluated over the synthetic datasets with varying dimensions (PERFORMANCE_TEST_CSV)
Group number | Matrix dimension | Avg. ET (ms) | Avg no. of biclusters | Avg. ET/bicluster (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 50 \(\times\) 50 | 49.9 | 925.5 | 0.053917 |
2 | 100 \(\times\) 100 | 289.2 | 4026.3 | 0.071828 |
3 | 150 \(\times\) 150 | 1101.6 | 9339.2 | 0.117954 |
4 | 200 \(\times\) 200 | 2882.5 | 16,960.2 | 0.169957 |
5 | 250 \(\times\) 250 | 6631.7 | 26,967.1 | 0.245918 |
6 | 300 \(\times\) 300 | 12,670.4 | 39,366.9 | 0.321854 |
7 | 350 \(\times\) 350 | 24,157.6 | 54,098.3 | 0.44655 |
8 | 400 \(\times\) 400 | 43,243.3 | 71,116 | 0.608067 |
9 | 450 \(\times\) 450 | 80,461.4 | 100,475.9 | 0.800803 |
10 | 500 \(\times\) 500 | 93,831.5 | 111,868.9 | 0.838763 |