Table 1 The performance of RUBic and BiBit was evaluated over the synthetic dataset with varying density of different 1’s (MATCH_SCORE_DENSITY_200X200_CSV)
Group number | Density of 1s’ | Avg. ET (ms) | Avg. bicluster number | Avg. match score | Avg.ET/ bicluster (ms) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUBic | BiBit | RUBic | BiBit | RUBic | BiBit | RUBic | BiBit | ||
1 | 5 | 22 | 480 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 1 | 0.755172 | 16.55172 |
2 | 10 | 51 | 1609 | 83 | 83 | 1 | 1 | 0.613253 | 19.38916 |
3 | 15 | 97 | 4912 | 249 | 249 | 1 | 1 | 0.390361 | 19.72771 |
4 | 20 | 163 | 12,230 | 634.2 | 634.2 | 1 | 1 | 0.257332 | 19.28445 |
5 | 25 | 261 | 27,539 | 1429.3 | 1429.3 | 1 | 1 | 0.182327 | 19.26754 |
6 | 30 | 476 | 66,204 | 3294.1 | 3294.1 | 1 | 1 | 0.144592 | 20.09769 |
7 | 35 | 839 | 126,517 | 6070.4 | 6070.4 | 1 | 1 | 0.138162 | 20.84158 |
8 | 40 | 1206 | 219,214 | 9472.3 | 9472.3 | 1 | 1 | 0.127297 | 23.14266 |
9 | 45 | 1620 | 320,150 | 12,977.7 | 12,977.7 | 1 | 1 | 0.124814 | 24.66927 |
10 | 50 | 2376 | 446,627 | 15,248.2 | 15,248.2 | 1 | 1 | 0.155848 | 29.2905 |