Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance comparison on the PharmaCoNER dataset

From: Deep learning with language models improves named entity recognition for PharmaCoNER

Method

P (%)

R (%)

F1 (%)

Baseline-Glove [32]

83.26

81.00

82.11

Baseline-Med [32]

87.02

83.71

85.34

Sun et al. [21]

90.46

88.06

89.24

Stoeckel et al. [19]

90.79

90.30

90.52

Xiong et al. [18]

91.23

90.88

91.05

Our method (BioBERTv1.1(+P,Cased))

92.44

91.59

92.01

  1. ‘P’ denotes PubMed
  2. The highest values are shown in bold