Method | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | MCC |
---|
TooT-M | 98.09 | 96.80 | 97.43 | 0.94 |
iMem-2LSAAC | 98.23 | 91.17 | 94.61 | 0.89 |
- This table compares the performance of TooT-M with the state-of-the-art iMem-2LSAAC predictor [3] on the same dataset, DS1. The best performance for each metric is highlighted in italics. TooT-M achieved a higher specificity, accuracy and MCC than iMem-2LSAAC