Skip to main content

Table 3 Disagreement with our class labels by 42 neuroscientists who participated in [14]

From: Towards a supervised classification of neocortical interneuron morphologies

 

ID

Layer

Cell type

DF

Agree

AR

CB

ChC

CR

CT

HT

LBC

MC

NGC

OT

UN

1

blueC040600B2

2/3

MC

CT

0

3

9

0

0

15

2

5

0

0

5

3

2

C050600B2

2/3

MC

LBC

1

0

5

0

0

10

1

20

1

0

2

3

3

C150600B-I1

2/3

MC

CT

1

1

11

0

0

16

0

9

1

0

3

1

4

C091000D-I3

5

ChC

CB

3

3

19

3

0

6

0

6

0

2

2

1

5

C260199A-I3

4

MC

CT

3

0

5

0

0

17

0

6

3

0

4

7

6

C170998D-I3

2/3

NGC

CB

5

1

19

0

0

11

0

0

0

5

4

2

7

C070600B2

4

MC

LBC

11

2

1

0

0

8

0

15

11

0

2

3

8

C090997A-I2

4

MC

CT

12

1

6

0

0

14

0

4

12

0

1

4

  1. Cell type is the label in our data, given according to the classification scheme from [6] while DF (standing for DeFelipe) is the majority label chosen by the neuroscientists, according to the scheme from [14]. Agree is the number of neuroscientists that coincided with our label, while columns to the right show the number of neuroscientists who selected the corresponding DF label (all shown in boldface): AR - arcade; CB - common basket; CR - Cajal-Retzius; CT - common type; HT - horse-tail; OT - other; UN - uncharacterized, meaning that the axonal morphology reconstruction was not sufficient to distinguish the type. The table shows eight out of the 20 interneurons which were classified as ChC, MC, or NGC —the three types common to both classification schemes— in our data yet differently by the majority of neuroscientists (column DF); for the remaining twelve interneurons, the neuroscientists’ majority label matched ours. Cell C040600B2, which was presented to the neuroscientists rotated upside-down, is marked in blue. ID can be used to look the neuron up at Neuromorpho.org