Skip to main content

Table 5 Performance comparison with other methods on DIP dataset using CYC2008 as benchmark

From: Construction of dynamic probabilistic protein interaction networks for protein complex identification

 

P

R

F

Sn

PPV

Acc

Our method

0.483

0.471

0.477

0.373

0.694

0.509

ClusterONE

0.428

0.331

0.373

0.364

0.665

0.493

COAN

0.486

0.438

0.461

0.435

0.555

0.491

COACH

0.364

0.468

0.41

0.544

0.38

0.455

CMC

0.595

0.287

0.387

0.399

0.566

0.475

HUNTER

0.685

0.199

0.308

0.496

0.467

0.482

MCL

0.21

0.232

0.221

0.555

0.331

0.429

  1. F: F-score, P: precision, R: recall. The highest score of each row is shown in bold