Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of biological coherence of clusters obtained for dataset II by different clustering algorithms

From: Microarray data mining: A novel optimization-based approach to uncover biologically coherent structures

 

Proportion of Genes (%) in Clusters of p-values

 

<= 10-4

<= 10-5

<= 10-4

<= 10-5

 

(Uncorrected)

(Bonferroni-Corrected)

EP_GOS_Clust

79.4*

66.1*

57.2

52.2*

Iterated EP_GOS_Clust

86.2*

83.9*

73.1*

68.9*

K-Means

78.0

62.1

58.0*

51.7

K-Correlation

77.1

63.9

57.3*

51.8

K-Medians

78.8*

65.3

56.9

52.2*

SOTA

75.2

66.9*

57.1

39.3

IClust

66.0

54.0

34.2

29.1

 

Cluster Correlation

-log10(P) Values

 

Max.

Min.

Ave.

Average

EP_GOS_Clust

0.920

0.454*

0.730*

9.17*

Iterated EP_GOS_Clust

0.956*

0.489*

0.750*

11.09*

K-Means

0.961*

0.049

0.668

9.01

K-Correlation

0.964*

0.398*

0.717*

9.13

K-Medians

0.923

0.203

0.683

9.09

SOTA

0.911

0.285

0.624

9.20*

IClust

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

9.01

  1. Methods include EP_GOS_Clust backbone, the iterative algorithm described in this report, the K-family of partitional clustering algorithms with pre-assigned clusters, self organizing tree algorithm (SOTA), and mutual information based clustering (IClust) [28]. Data in the upper table are presented as described in the legend to Table 2 while the lower table presents data on expression correlation within clusters and the average -log(P) values for biological coherence over all the clusters.
  2. * The top three performers in each category are indicated with an asterisk.