BMC Bioinformatics

Table 3 Performance comparison of different approaches using cross-validation for the benchmark data sets.

From: Protein subcellular localization prediction based on compartment-specific features and structure conservation

	PS1302
Localization	HYBRID		CELLO		PSORTb v.1.1		PSLpred		P-CLASSIFIER
	Acc (%)	MCC	Acc (%)	MCC	Acc (%)	MCC	Acc (%)	MCC	Acc (%)	MCC
CP	95.6	0.90	90.7	0.85	69.4	0.79	90.7	0.86	94.6	0.85
IM	93.3	0.94	88.4	0.92	78.7	0.85	86.8	0.88	87.1	0.92
PP	91.4	0.88	86.9	0.80	57.6	0.69	90.3	0.90	85.9	0.81
OM	96.3	0.96	94.6	0.90	90.3	0.93	95.2	0.95	93.6	0.90
EC	90.0	0.89	78.9	0.82	70.0	0.79	90.6	0.84	86.0	0.89
Overall	93.7	-	88.9	-	74.8	-	91.2	-	89.8	-
	PS1444
Localization	HYBRID		CELLO II		PSORTb v.2.0		PSLpred		P-CLASSIFIER
	Acc (%)	MCC	Acc (%)	MCC	Acc (%)	MCC	Acc (%)	MCC	Acc (%)	MCC
CP	95.0	0.91	95.3	0.89	70.1	0.77	-	-	-	-
IM	93.5	0.94	90.0	0.91	92.6	0.92	-	-	-	-
PP	90.2	0.86	87.7	0.82	69.2	0.78	-	-	-	-
OM	96.7	0.96	92.8	0.90	94.9	0.95	-	-	-	-
EC	87.4	0.87	79.5	0.82	78.9	0.86	-	-	-	-
Overall	93.2	-	90.0	-	82.6	-	-	-	-	-

§ The best performance of overall and individual localization sites is underlined.

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com