From: Differences in codon bias cannot explain differences in translational power among microbes
Comparison organism | rrn copy#a | Specific growth rateb (culture)c (hr-1) | Actual growth temp.d (cor.)e | Compared byf | E. coli comp. growth rateg (hr-1) | Translational powerh | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sphingopyxis alaskensis | 1 | 0.29 (B) | 30°C (1.80) | RCi | >1.73j | <17%j | [39] |
sulfate reducing strain PT2k | (2) | 0.40 (B) | 23°C (3.34) | RNA | >1.73j | <17%j | [91] |
Streptomyces coelicolor | 6 | 0.54 (B) | 30°C (1.80) | RNA | >1.73j | <21%j | [40] |
Halobacterium cutirubrum | 2 | 0.10 (B) | 37°C | rRNA | 0.49 | 22% | [37] |
Rickettsia prowazekii | 1 | 0.09 (B) | 34°C (1.28) | RCi | 0.37 | 24% | [38] |
Synechococcus sp. 6301 | (2) | 0.16 (C) | 39°C (0.85) | RNA | 0.36 | 42% | [92] |
Streptomyces hygroscopicus | (6) | 0.58 – 0.90l (B, C) | 28°C (2.14) | RNA | 0.82 – >1.73j, l | <42%j – 110%l | [93] |
Megasphaera elsdenii | - | 0.20 (C) | 39°C (0.85) | RNA | 0.46 | 44% | [94] |
Bacillus cereus | 6 | 0.61 (C) | 34°C (1.28) | RNA | 1.22 | 51% | [95] |
Selenomonas ruminantium | - | 0.30 – 0.43l (C) | 39°C (0.85) | RNA | 0.35 – 0.88l | 50% – 78%l | [96, 97] |
Salmonella enterica | 7 | 1.66 (B) | 37°C | rRNA | 1.63 | 102% | [1] |
Enterobacter aerogenes | (7) | 0.94 (C) | 35°C (1.18) | RNA | 0.80 | 123% – 154%l | [98] |
Lactococcus lactis | 6 | 1.9 (B) | 30°C (1.80) | RNA | 0.51 | 391% | [99] |