Skip to main content

Table 1 Pairwise agreement between methods. For each pair among the seven processing methods, the ratio of the number of probe sets with FDR0 < 0.05 in both methods to the number of probe sets with FDR0 < 0.05 in either method was calculated. Results are displayed as percentages.

From: Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data

  

Colon

Ovary

t-test

EB

9

     

77

     
 

MAS5

19

45

    

68

88

    
 

MLE

15

60

60

   

94

81

72

   
 

PDNN

68

14

28

23

  

93

83

73

98

  
 

RMA

58

16

32

26

86

 

92

83

74

98

100

 
 

DCHIP

90

8

17

14

60

52

95

81

71

99

97

97

Rank-Sum

EB

39

     

90

     
 

MAS5

38

88

    

73

82

    
 

MLE

84

32

32

   

99

89

72

   
 

PDNN

45

86

84

38

  

98

91

74

97

  
 

RMA

71

54

53

60

63

 

88

98

83

87

89

 
 

DCHIP

94

41

40

79

48

75

99

91

74

98

99

89

  

TM

EB

MAS5

MLE

PDNN

RMA

TM

EB

MAS5

MLE

PDNN

RMA