Skip to main content

Table 2 Quantitative characteristics of the considered GO (BP+CC+MF) gene annotation datasets in their July 2009 version and March 2013 updated version from the GPDW.

From: Computational algorithms to predict Gene Ontology annotations

Dataset

July 2009

March 2013

#a comparison

 

#g

#f

#a

#g

#f

#a

Δ

Δ%

Curated annotations

Bos taurus

734

3,714

32,232

2,243

8,421

1,44,358

1,12,126

347.87

Danio rerio

1,807

2,967

49,834

3,825

6,848

1,79,142

1,29,308

259.47

Drosophila m.

8,722

6,516

3,08,962

10,304

8,850

5,17,457

2,08,495

67.48

Computational annotations

Bos taurus

11,646

6,927

3,35,063

5,428

9,107

2,32,945

−102,118

−30.47

Danio rerio

14,114

3,270

2,62,940

15,439

4,191

3,45,712

82,772

31.47

Drosophila m.

7,950

2,136

86,207

8,433

2,560

96,354

10,147

11.77

  1. Figures do not include GO annotations with IEA or ND evidence, nor obsolete GO terms and genes. #g: number of genes; #f: number of function features (GO terms); #a: number of GO gene annotations; Δ: difference of annotation number between the two dataset versions; Δ%: percentage difference of annotation number between the two dataset versions. Drosophila m.: Drosophila melanogaster organism.