Table 5 Results for comparison between two precursor prediction methods.
From: HHMMiR: efficient de novo prediction of microRNAs using hierarchical hidden Markov models
Test Set | Total hairpins | Triplet SVM (%) | HHMMiR (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
Positive Sets | |||
New human hairpins in registry at the time. | 39 | 92.3 | 97.4 |
M. musculus | 36 | 94.4 | 88.9 |
R. norvegicus | 25 | 80.0 | 84.0 |
G. gallus | 13 | 84.6 | 100 |
D. rerio | 6 | 66.7 | 100 |
C. elegans | 110 | 86.4 | 90.9 |
C. briggsae | 73 | 95.9 | 95.9 |
D. melanogaster | 71 | 91.6 | 95.8 |
D. pseudoobscura | 71 | 90.1 | 98.6 |
A. thaliana | 75 | 92.0 | 97.3 |
O. sativa | 96 | 94.8 | 86.5 |
Epstein Barr virus | 5 | 100 | 80.0 |
TOTAL | 620 | 91 | 93.2 |
Negative Sets | |||
Folded genome hairpins from Chromosome 19 | 2444 | 89 | 88.6 |
Negative hairpin Set | 1000 | 88.1 | 89.4 |
TOTAL | 3444 | 88.7 | 88.8 |