Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of the weighted accuracy on the test set of the best result from our voting method versus some well known cancer treatment guidelines

From: A voting approach to identify a small number of highly predictive genes using multiple classifiers

Classifier Weighted accuracy on Test set
C4.5 with boosting 91.67%
St. Gallen 1998* 68%
NIH 2000* 79%
NPI* 58%
70-genes* 74%
BPIM* 68%
BDIM* 58%
  1. *Results obtained from Gevaert et al. [43], where results were provided as number of true positives and true negatives.
\